SOC W6301 Week 7 Assignment Quantitative Research Study Critique

SOC W6301 Week 7 Assignment Quantitative Research Study Critique

 

Student name

Walden University

SOCW 6301

Professor Name

Submission Date

 

Quantitative Research Study Critique

Such a possibility to read Wentworth (2020) and to implement the principles outlined in the article in the analysis of a research study is examined in this part of the assignment. The following features would be scrutinized as part of this critique. These are the appropriateness of title and author, the conciseness and relevancy of the literature review, the appropriateness of the research strategy and methodology adopted, among others.

The problems of internal validity will be addressed next, and finally, the discussion on how the results of the study can be applied to the practice of social work will be provided. During the critical review of the framework by Wentworth, the strengths and weaknesses of the framework will be reviewed in a methodical way to determine the usefulness of the framework in boosting EBPs.

Title and Authors

The article title, Critical Reading to Evaluation, is also used to summarize the concept of the work in a nice way because the study focuses on the critical reading skills required to make an evaluation of the research studies.

It is quite effective in informing readers, and it makes one aware of the fact that the article under discussion is interested in providing the reader with checklists or the criteria according to which research may be evaluated critically. But it is somewhat unclear to consider the contents of the article in which the authors introduce a highly strict model of research evaluation.

Speaking of the details regarding the author, we can determine the credibility of their work by referring to the personal academic and professional experience of the author, H. Wentworth. In this article, the author fails to provide certain data on the associations with Wentworth or any prior publication. A search made on the author provides information that the author authored on the development of academic skills, particularly research evaluation.

When the article is written by a person who has sufficient knowledge in the field, then it is more likely that Wentworth is affiliated with a research body or a given academic institution, which means that the article can be regarded as credible. It is absolutely important to note that the validity of the framework presented in the article is under the condition of its foundation on the available literature and research practices to some extent.

Literature Review

The article by Wentworth (2020) features a broad literature review that posits the topicality of critical reading as applied to the evaluation in the entire field of academic and professional research. The article is based on the research conducted on the necessity of critical reading in creating a mature and wise attitude towards practice. Research should be evaluated critically in areas of practice that are presumed to be reliant on research, such as social work. This critique of the literature review identifies the original theories and previous studies concerning the field of research evaluation. Critically reading makes it clear that one should follow some order.

Nevertheless, it is somewhat deficient in depth in making specific recommendations regarding directions in the literature that are yet to be explored. Even though it contains the overall message that the critical reading skills of the student need to be developed. It does not provide a precise clarification of what past studies have not been attentive to regarding various practical sides of critical analysis. The given study is framed squarely within these issues and adds to the existing literature by introducing the framework of EBPP that Wentworth suggests to the literature review.

Strategy of Research

The design adopted by Wentworth in the article being examined is mainly exploratory as the author tries to find out different methods of critical reading regarding research studies. This type of strategy is appropriate to the research question asked due to the possibility of collecting various approaches and practices of critical reading.

Consequently, in terms of discussing the many points of the critical reading process, the article fulfills its purpose of contributing to the framework on practice by practitioners, particularly in the social work field, to enhance the evaluative component. This is the strength of the study, as this methodology allows the author to learn and uncover things about critical reading without being guided by a restricted hypothesis; thus, profound knowledge of the field of study is attained.

Methodological Approach and Design

As it was mentioned above, the article by Wentworth (2020) is qualitative in nature. Indeed, the article provides a quantitative and systematic structure of critical reading concerning research evaluation. The research design is still vague, and therefore, the study does not elaborate on its definite methodology of research design.

In the event that the objective of the research was to gather views or the prevalence of activities concerning critical reading, then the survey design might have been sufficient. The validity of the research was in question because there were no proper sampling strategies and data collection procedures.

This fact could lead to the inability of the article to provide a definite answer to the questions of the study due to the absence of a definite, quantitative developmental approach. Moreover, the design that might have been adopted would be qualitative, this is because it would facilitate the determination of richer data that would elaborate on the experiences and attitudes of the practitioners.

Threats to Internal Validity

The article fails to explain how internal validity could be jeopardized, such as by sampling or by assessment measures. Wentworth (2020) does not indicate the sample size or the method used to select the participants. There is a big question about whether the study can be generalized or not, and whether the study is in some way biased.

In addition, there is little certainty in the study because there is no standardized methodology for how structures and linkages of the framework provided here can be measured, or even as a means of validation. The inability to talk of confounding factors also diminishes the overall assessment of internal validity, therefore, casting doubt on the generalization of the findings made out of the acquired study.

Application to Practice

The implications of the discovery of the article about critical reading as a way of evaluation by Wentworth can be applied to the necessity of enhancing the skills of the practitioners in the aspects of a critical approach to reading the research work. Social workers can use the structure offered above to determine the reliability and relevance of various studies in order to make better decisions.

However, due to these limitations in the article and the lack of more efficient methods of determining internal validity, one has to be more careful about integrating this knowledge. Even though the ideas behind the critical reading are rather helpful, there is a strong deficit in the use of the empirical approach, and the issues with certain definitions.

The ensuing deficiency of clear, articulated, quantifiable methods of critical reading can be viewed as a weakness in the practical use in the professional context. In this regard, the knowledge might be of good value, but then it might need further empirical validation before it is universally applied.

Conclusion

Finally, the article by Wentworth (2020) about the critical reading framework may be useful in the social work practice because it invites a viewer to analyze the texts provided in the given texts. However, certain issues are associated with the methodology of the study, and insensitivity to the internal validity had a significant impact on the overall study reliability.

Stricter empirical data are needed to justify the framework, despite the fact that the current study is helpful in the enrichment of knowledge. Thus, the information provided in the article may serve as an excellent starting point for social workers. Other higher-methodology research data should be added to the article in order not to put on the shelf the knowledge presented in it, and apply it to practice safely.

Related Free Assessment for SOC W6301

SOC W6301 Week 9 Assignment Research Proposal Part 1

Need help with SOC W6301 Week 7 Assignment Quantitative Research Study Critique? Get expert critique support and score higher. Click now!