SWK 5004 Week 10 Assignment 1

SWK 5004 Week 10 Assignment 1

 

Student Name

Capella University

SWK5004 Micro Social Work Practice

Professor Name

Submission Date

 

Introduction

The termination stage is an essential component of the process of helping in the practice of social work that enables the client and practitioner to contemplate the progress, solidify the strengths, and move on to further development. In the case of the Santos Family, Maria and her two sons, Jose and Ryan, this last session should be sensitive towards the trauma histories, cultural experience, mistrust of the systems, and family movement towards safety and stability.

Maria is a Mexican immigrant who was subjected to violence and emotional abuse by multiple partners for the rest of her life. This experience makes her reserved with authority and generally continues to struggle with parenting and emotional control. Jose is ten years old and has good academic performance, but has difficulties with dysregulation of behaviour and social interaction, and Ryan is two years old with severe asthma and vulnerability to medical conditions.

This written termination summary is meant to show how the last session would steer close to engagement, reflection on progress, and emotional reactions to the end of services, planning the next steps with the client, and empowering the client in a strengths-based framework of cultural responsiveness (Suraworachet et al., 2023). This reflection correlates with the EPAS competencies, which are cultural humility, ethical practice, engagement, assessment, intervention, and evaluation.

Termination Summary with the Santos Family

The helping relationship with Maria and her children has focused on the need to achieve more safety, confidence with parenting, increasing emotional control in Jose, and ensuring that Ryan will have regular medical treatment. The session would involve, as a part of termination, respectfully joining Maria, and recognizing that she is committed to her children despite the enormous trauma she has been through.

Maria has an abuse history and a lack of trust towards governmental agencies, which implies that it will be necessary to confirm her bravery and strength in creating a safe emotional environment in conducting the work jointly. At the beginning, by employing culturally responsive and trauma-informed strategies, the worker would recap the objectives that have been set at the start of the helping process, which involves stabilizing routines of the children, helping with the behavioral demands of Jose, and guiding Maria on accessing resources.

The session would reveal how Maria has made some improvements, namely, her readiness to ask for help easily, her desire to provide for her children with a better life, and her increased chances of imagining how her history of trauma affects her responses to stress. The academic strengths of Jose would be enhanced, and the behavioral issues that are still with him would be observed and supported.

The employee would then assess the emotional reaction of the family towards the termination of services. Since Maria was already abandoned and had an unstable background, she may not know at first, she may be afraid of losing the system, or even if she could do this on her own. The employee would rationalize these feelings, and he or she would leave Maria alone to air out her issues without disruption and reaffirm to her that she will grow and her nurturing feelings towards her children will go on even after they are out of this helping relationship. The second step would be to have the worker, in partnership with Maria, assess the impending needs and referral.

In the case of Jose, it can be a continuation of attachment to behavioral health services that would assist in his adjustment disorder and development of social skills (Morgan et al., 2022). Maria has already refused to be medicated by Jose, and the worker would treat this conversation with cultural sensitivity, i.e., taking into consideration her worry about treatment but delicately providing psychoeducation and other resources.

In the case of Ryan, the idea would be the continued management of his severe asthma and heart murmur with the help of pediatric care, and sufficient follow-up through providing Maria with access to transport and insurance means.

The case closure would reiterate what Maria has brought to the table: being bilingual, being smart, being hardworking, and an apparent drive to provide her children with a better future. The previous employer had called her intelligent and witty and affirmed that she could be a successful person, and this can be worked on in terms of future goal-setting.

Lastly, the worker and Maria would jointly come up with the following steps, such as community programs and parenting support groups; school-based services; and possible job-ready programs once she sorts out childcare and health routines. At the conclusion of the session, a review of good news and support, and an affirmation that Maria does have what it takes to keep on with the safety, stability, and long-term well-being would be given.

Demonstration of EPAS Competencies

1. Cultural Humility and Ethical Practice

The session tries to include an appreciation of the trauma history of Maria, immigration history, lingual proficiency, and profound pessimism of social systems as a result of past bad experiences (Singh et al., 2022). The worker fails to make judgment and admits failures to understand the difference in power and respect her worldview, and hence demonstrates cultural humility.

2. Engagement, Empathy, and Active Listening

During termination, the worker is empathic and shows joining, paraphrasing, and open-ended questions, and provides an undisturbed space to allow Maria to express her thoughts, which is equivalent to the expectations of EPAS (Bletscher & Lee, 2021).

3. Assessment and Recognition of Client Strengths

The worker recognizes and emphasizes the strengths of the family, which include the resiliency of Maria, his academic success, and the sweetness/social interaction demonstrated by Ryan in order to facilitate strengths-based end to the services.

4. Intervention and Planning for Continuity of Care

The termination plan will satisfy the mental health needs of Jose, the medical vulnerability of Ryan, and the need of Maria to have further community supports. Shared plans will make the family strong and not dependent.

5. Evaluation of Progress and Goal Achievement

The employee observes the set objectives, safer working, set routines, confidence, and attachment to resources, and checks the progress of the family and the points to be advanced.

Conclusion

Ms. Santos’ Family needs to be terminated with a delicate balance of empathy, cultural responsiveness, and empowerment. The review of the achievements of the family, the emotional response to ceasing services, and the establishment of a plan of collaboration in the continued provision of assistance allow the worker to facilitate stability and resiliency outside of the formal helping relationship.

The lack of trust in the authority and the mistrust of the authorities, which corresponds to the history of the trauma Maria had, means that she should be approached in a sensitive and strengths-based manner that will support her skills instead of judging her on her deficiencies.

The developmental and medical needs of Jose and Ryan still require further coordination of services with the community partners. Still, with the improvement in the course of the services, they have the basis to be healthier in the future. By employing a culturally humble and client-focused termination process, the family can continue with clarity and confidence, and improved ability to make long-term well-being.

Related Free Assessments for SWK5004

SWK 5004 Week 8 Assignment 1 Role-Play 3 Treatment Plan

SWK 5004 Week 8 Assignment 2 Role Play Reflection

SWK 5004 Week 9 Assessment Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Assessment Report

Struggling with SWK 5004 Week 10 Assignment 1? Writink Services provides step-by-step guidance to boost grades fast. Get help now!